View Single Post
Old 12-24-05, 08:13 AM   #18 (permalink)
LHR
Aximsite Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 63
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Forgot to mention something - it's my understanding that by having the direct S-video out / RCA connection, we would have considerably less picture distortion than if we used several adapters/converters to get there.

For example: having a VGA-out that needs to be connected to a Std analog TV via RCA connectors would likely cause much more picture degradation....

X51v >>> VGA-out cable >>> VGA-RCA converter >>> Analog TV (Highly Undesirable)

whereas,

X51v >>> RCA-out (yellow, red , white) >>> Analog TV (Highly Desirable) :approve:

even this scenario is likely to produce distortions:

X51v >>> S-out >>> S-RCA adapter >>> Analog TV (Somewhat Undesirable)

Hypothesis: It would be highly desirable to have all 3 interfaces connecting as a "direct-Out" to minimize any signal degradation in the conversion process, i.e., converter(s)/adapter(s) used in between.

Is my hypothesis/assumption valid?

Therefore, assuming my reasoning was correct, I would want to have all 3 direct-out:
#1 - VGA-out to connect to PCs/monitors
#2 - RCA-out to connect to old Analog TV's, a 7" LCD Portable DVD player, etc.
#3 - S-out to connect to my HDTV set at home + other video devices.

Now that would really make my New Year's Cable-out WISH come true. (Assuming that my reasoning above is correct)

Of course, this would bring the price up; however, it would still be a bargain compared to what you would pay for VGA-RCA converter. Just my thoughts.

Anyone, pls feel free to correct anything I may have mentioned that might be out of whack. cheers.
LHR is offline   Reply With Quote