|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by Pez
Yes because the xscale chips werent optimized for ppc2002 and they are for ppc2003, right now strong arm chips run a bit faster then xscales on ppc2002 amazingly
|
Pez,
I wasn't trying to offend, but to say your statement correctly it would need to be: "Yes because PPC2002 wasn't optimized for Xscale chips and PPC2003 is optimized for Xscale chips, right now Strongarm chips run PPC2002 a bit faster than Xscales amazingly."
I hate being pedantic, but I thought that some of the descriptions were misleading.
Here's an excerpt from a press release on Microsoft's website:
"Windows CE .NET will include an optimized compiler, kernel, and board support package for the Intel® PXA250 and Intel® PXA210 applications processors and Intel DBPXA250 development system in support of Intel PCA, Intel's development blueprint for designing wireless handheld communication devices that combine voice communications and Internet access capabilities. "
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
cageyjames - thanks for the info. Your qualified assessment is good enough for me. If you can't notice the difference, I doubt any of us will.