|
Originally Posted by Dobermann
|
Somewhere here in a link I was reading a review of iLaunch. If I remember correctly, it used a lot of memory - more so than other programs, plus there were some other issues with it that I cannot remember.
Okay, after a quick search, here is the link on the thread by Menneisyys, and here is the link to the matrix comparison.
Yep, it was dynamic memory consumption that was 1.58MB - quite a chunk!
I see they have updated the version from the matrix comparison. Perhaps some of the issues raised have been fixed. I wouldn't imagine that you know if they fixed the 1.58MB issue, would you? I think I will fire them off an email asking that and about the other points raised in the comparison.
Cheers,
Dobermann
|
Hi Dobermann :)
First, I want to say I'm really sorry for replying on a post regarding one of our software titles; I usually really try to avoid replying on posts regarding our software (apart from support questions of course where I do my best to answer as quick as possible :) ), but I almost never reply to a post that refers to our software like this one.
However, I was reading this thread and I was so sure that I saw a post from Menneisyys saying the opposite thing than what you've mentioned in your post, that I thought it will be fair to mention it here too, since we've worked a lot to fix those issue with the latest version and I think it will be fair to mention it as a reply to your post :) (I really hope this is OK of course).
I've checked the review that you linked too and you are right, Menneisyys' review on this post indeed complains about a few issues with iLauncher, but, please notice this review is updated to version 2.1.01 and we are now at version 2.3.02 at this stage :)
I was starting to search for the post that I had in mind from Menneisyys and couldn't find it too... but, after a while searching through AximSite, I've managed to locate the posts that I remembered :approve:
This reply was posted by Menneisyys to the new iLauncher thread release (when version 2.3 was released) stating that:
"The SBSH people must have done something pretty damn well because (or, used the memory model of WM5 very good / dynamically swap their stuff in and out the dynamic memory when it's not needed – I don't know yet) I've consistently measured far better (lower) memory consumption results with the new version than with the previous version."
You can read his reply I'm talking about in the following URL:
http://www.aximsite.com/boards/showp...4&postcount=18
In addition, on the same thread, you can find Menneisyys' review update (among the first 5 replies on this thread I believe) for the new iLauncher version :)
Ok - enough talking about iLauncher then

I just felt it will be fair to mention that there was an update for the software since then and also an update for the review.
Have a wonderful new day!