angel008

see
http://www.handango.com/PlatformProd...0&platformId=2


it says it can make youre 300 mhz on 400 and the 400 on 500 mhz didn't test it just want to let u know

wanna hear some guys say if it dous or dousn''t work

Cesio

Well, I'm sure it's great but is there a significant point? I'm not being sarcastic, I just don't know what application(s) or activities that would benefit from it.

Enlighten me?

angel008

wel my movies are now at 10-12 fps where the where first 7-8



enlightend???

opus1971

Did you notice any improvement other than movies? Just curious. ;)

angel008

yes some progs started up faster

aoe runs faster (loading)
more games runs faster

silentknight

Did you know they have a AXIM specific version
of this? the link you gave us, was not to the axim
version.

here is the link for the Axim:
http://www.handango.com/PlatformProd...roductId=54761

__________________


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

opus1971

Well, If they hve a Dell specific version, that seems like a good thing. I'm going to try it tonight.

angel008

yes i knew that i used the dell version sorry but was my link not linked to the dell version i thought sow


i did used the dell version:P

silentknight

Ok here's some Benchmarks, from Pocket PC Benchmarks:

Axim set at 400MHz:
CPU Benchmark
-Integer arithmetic 5023
-Heap Management 8742
-Floatingpoint arithmetic 8468
Graphics Benchmark
-GDI graphic routines 1 2023
-GDI graphic routines 2 1437
-GDI graphic routines 3 1970
Flat File Benchmark
-File: writing 8169
-File: writing 125.4 kb/s
-File: reading 20040
-File: reading 51097.8 kb/s

Axim set at 500Mhz:
CPU Benchmark
-Integer arithmetic 4680
-Heap Management 7193
-Floatingpoint arithmetic 7369
Graphics Benchmark
-GDI graphic routines 1 1797
-GDI graphic routines 2 1199
-GDI graphic routines 3 1779
Flat File Benchmark
-File: writing 7020
-File: writing 145.9 kb/s
-File: reading 20324
-File: reading 50383.8 kb/s

__________________


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Fritz

Ghetto, so it actually slows down??

__________________
"To be, or not to be is true." -- Boole

silentknight

No, the lower numbers are better (less time
it took to complete a task) Thats the
way benchmarks usually are anyway..

__________________


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

maarten

So a 25% overclock (400-500mhz) will gain 10% or less most of the time when comparing the figures... naah.. too little gain to burn my hands on ;)

__________________
Dell Axim X5 400Mhz/64MB
SanDisk 256MB SD/ 64MB+128MB CF
Pretec WiFi

Fritz

Quote:

Originally posted by silentknight No, the lower numbers are better (less time it took to complete a task) Thats the way benchmarks usually are anyway..

Ah, my bad!

Cheers.

__________________
"To be, or not to be is true." -- Boole

Ash

so ......for joe average, is this something to get involved with.


signed,
Joe Average......lol

__________________
I like long walks...especially when taken by people I don't like.

Chrissss

This might be somewhat Ok for the 400's, but I wouldn't try it on a 300.

From what I've read, the processors in all the Ax's are the same. During frequency testing they try to run the processor up to 400+ MHz. Those that pass go into the 400's. Those that pass the 300 mark, but destabilize before 400 MHz become the processors for the 300 unit.

Therefore attempting to push the 300 up to 400 is doomed to failure.

I can't vouch for the validity of the above...it's just what I've read here & there. Others more knowledgable then I can perhaps confirm/deny this.

Chris...