|
Originally Posted by pdawg17
|
|
It appears that the BT units are cheaper than the "standalones"...is there any other reason to get a BT unit?
|
I think it depends on how you will use the GPS most frequently. Think about the kinds of activities in which GPS will play a role. Are you a hiker or a boater/sailor? Do you geocache? Do you want navigation just for your Auto?
I actually have three GPS units; the one I use least is a rather large, heavy, battery-sucking standalone Garmin Street Pilot. It works well-enough but it is big, heavy and is only used in the car. However, I have now switched my car navigation system to an X30H, OnCourse Navigator and the Globalsat BT338. So, the Street Pilot is performing excellent duty as a paperweight ($ offers accepted!).
My other standalone unit is a Garmin eTrex Vista. I use it for hiking, kayaking and geocaching. It's rugged, waterproof (ask me how I know) and very accurate since it receives WAAS signaling. However, its display is rather small and is monochrome; not easy to see while driving. But I wouldn't dare take my X30H/BT338 on a kayaking trip so, for me, the rugged standalone works for those activities.
If you are going to use GPS primarily for in-car navigation, I'd humbly recommend a PDA with a BT GPS receiver. The PDA will have a (relatively) large color screen and a seperate GPS can always be upgraded (by replacement) as GPS technology advances. You won't be messing around with wires and can have a little more freedom in the placement of the GPSR.
Hope this helps...
Theo