Notices

HTC Touch Pro / HTC Fuze HTC Touch Pro / HTC Fuze Discussion Forums

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-29-09, 10:20 AM   #1 (permalink)
Aximsite Prospect
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 4
Device: HTC Fuze
Carrier: ATT
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ATT Warranty exchange: reducing the cost of replacement

I recently ran the gauntlet with ATT over a warranty exchange fro my HTC Fuze, which developed some cracks in the cover sheet of the touch screen (deemed cosmetic damage) as it was still fully functional.

The warranty exchange was failry straightforward, reciving the replacement (refurb) handset in one day. The challenge came two weeks later, when a crushed box arrived with the first handset, and a letter indicating that it was refused for warranty exchange and I would be billed $455.00 for the replacement.

After several hours on the phone with ATT Warranty department, and having my complaint "escalated" through five different people, the cost was down to the street price of a refurbed handset with no carrier contract (as of yesterday about $150.00 on Amazon with no contract).

IF you choose to go this route, be prepared to aergue your position and stick to your guns. The original replacement charge of $450.00 is clearly several times the value of the acual cost of a refurbed handset (this will continue to drop as the product ages).

NO CLUE why the cover glass cracked; work from home and rarely carry the phone any place. When I do it is in a protective case and pretty secure. Yes, in retrospect perhaps I should have opted for the breakage coverage, but ut seems expensive compared to the acutal cost of replacing completely a handset.

Anyone experieincing bad screens from this vendor? It is quite hot here, perhaps thermal shock going from heat to cold?
bcfd29 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsor Ads
Old 10-02-09, 09:30 AM   #2 (permalink)
Aximsite Veteran
 
breley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 2,211
Device: HTC Fuze
Carrier: AT&T
Thanked 34 Times in 30 Posts
Blog Entries: 1

Awards Showcase
Aximsite Active Silver Member Aximsite Bronze Tutorials Admin Medal Aximsite Gold Contributors Aximsite Gold Reviews Top Notch MyPDA Reviewer Medal Aximsite Bronze Contributors 
Total Awards: 10

I imagine in many cases it's quite difficult to demonstrate a possible manufacture defect from accidental (or otherwise) damage. So far my Fuze has held up admirably...even surviving a 4' fall onto hard tile (darned slippery chassis!).
I've used quite a number of different phones over the years and have never had a screen crack yet, so if you've been careful with your unit it might well have been a faulty unit. Give the layout of the touchscreen, it seems odd that the cracks would be on the edge...I would expect crush damage to be near the center of the unit, since that's where the weakest point would be. Now unless you pressed really, really hard on the up arrow on the d-pad it doesn't seem like the type of fracture that would occur from most accidents, IMHO.
__________________
breley | Aximsite/Mobility Site Review Staff, Administrator | Judge, Smartphone & Pocket PC Best Software Awards 2008
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.



breley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-09, 11:58 PM   #3 (permalink)
Aximsite Prospect
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
At&t warranty exchange unfair!

Originally Posted by bcfd29 View Post
I recently ran the gauntlet with ATT over a warranty exchange fro my HTC Fuze, which developed some cracks in the cover sheet of the touch screen (deemed cosmetic damage) as it was still fully functional.

The warranty exchange was failry straightforward, reciving the replacement (refurb) handset in one day. The challenge came two weeks later, when a crushed box arrived with the first handset, and a letter indicating that it was refused for warranty exchange and I would be billed $455.00 for the replacement.

After several hours on the phone with ATT Warranty department, and having my complaint "escalated" through five different people, the cost was down to the street price of a refurbed handset with no carrier contract (as of yesterday about $150.00 on Amazon with no contract).

IF you choose to go this route, be prepared to aergue your position and stick to your guns. The original replacement charge of $450.00 is clearly several times the value of the acual cost of a refurbed handset (this will continue to drop as the product ages).

NO CLUE why the cover glass cracked; work from home and rarely carry the phone any place. When I do it is in a protective case and pretty secure. Yes, in retrospect perhaps I should have opted for the breakage coverage, but ut seems expensive compared to the acutal cost of replacing completely a handset.

Anyone experieincing bad screens from this vendor? It is quite hot here, perhaps thermal shock going from heat to cold?


My husband’s Motorola Tundra was in his pocket. The phone started to burn him while it was in his pocket. There were no incoming calls. He immediately removed his phone and set it down for about thirty minutes. He tried to power the phone up but to no avail. I called AT&T to exchange the phone since it was only about eight months old.

I was told by the Warranty Exchange department that if there were any liquid damage the warranty would be void. Upon looking at the litmus indicator I noticed there were pink speckles. I did not want to pay for a phone that was obviously defective and not abused by my husband.

Therefore, I called AT&T again and explained again that the Tundra was not exposed to water. The representative told me that nothing could be done by AT&T until my next billing cycle when the new phone would be charged to my account. I was told not to worry and go ahead and send the phone in and a Commitment Call would be made to clear up the situation on the next billing cycle if AT&T did not hear from me.

I did receive the new Tundra and returned the damaged phone. The damaged phone was returned to me indicating that the liquid damage indicator was removed. I DID NOT REMOVE THE INDICATOR! I was charged $210.

In the meantime, I called Motorola. The Motorola technician told me that the litmus paper could have been activated by a leaky battery.

I telephoned AT&T today and the $210 was reduced by half. I spoke with three levels of representatives indicating that I did not feel paying anything was acceptable by me based on the principle of this matter. Our original Motorola Tundra was only eight months old and obviously defective. I feel that AT&T is basically accusing me of being dishonest because the liquid damage indicator had pink speckles. What other alternative did I have but to send the phone in since we use it in our business. I accepted the reduction for the cost of the new Tundra with hesitation. It is not so much the money but the principle of this issue. I am a very dissatisfied customer.
txkar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-09, 01:52 PM   #4 (permalink)
Aximsite Prospect
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am happy to report that after sending a letter to At&T's customer care I received a call and they are refunding me the full amount of the Tundra replacement phone. I guess it pays to be persistent!
txkar is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
att, cost, exchange, reducing, replacement, warranty

Sponsor Ads

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:19 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2003-09 LeckMedia, LLC