They are, but they had a different web site url. Prior to 12/3 you could get to an HP web page that looks very much like the one you provided, but for the 211. On 12/3 that link provided an blank HP web page...
According to the product guide filed with the FCC, the iPAQ 200 series is actually 133.8 mm in length as opposed to the 126 mm reported on hp's website.
__________________ Future Setup
iPAQ 210, Sandisk SDHC Plus 4GB
Software
TCPMP, Pocket eSword, Scrabble
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
__________________
... here are a few of my favorite things.... Hx4700 WM6.1 , AcerAspire One A150 , Canon 30D DSLR . . . .new GF not necessarily in this order.....
what number you guys calling to get some information?
cos the customer service number is always busy, ive spent 10 minutes just listening to the radio!
__________________
went from x51v=>toshiba E800=>IPAQ HX2490B => Ipaq 114 (with 4gb SD card)
I would wait for the 210. I have a 110/111. Box says 111 device says 111. I find the screen har compared to other iPAQs and it tends to miss some key taps. It always wants to be on. I don't know if it is the location of the on/off switch and the fact that any plugging into the USB port turns the device on. I am always finding it on in my pocket.
Also I hope the 210 has the HP protection software. The 110 has the Microsoft protecetion/lock software and that is always active such that you are always finding the system locked even if just docked for 10 minutes. I like the HP version better it only satrts the timer after the device has been turned off. Also fo some reason after a soft reset my device always reverts back to a bightness timeout setting of 1 minute unless I disable that function.
Anyone that is cheezed off at the delays, consider there might be a good reason for the delays?
With the recent news of WM6.1 available after the first of the year, maybe HP is just being smart to be able to have the latest and best OS for their customers.
I want this too but am willing to wait and not go off on HP when I do not know the reasons for the delay in release.
Have they handled it well? No but then most companies are not well versed in communicating with their customers.