Notices

iPaq 200 Series (iPAQ 210) The iPaq 210 is a powerful Windows Mobile 6 Pocket PC designed for business.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-18-08, 11:48 AM   #1 (permalink)
gylman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
side by side comparison of 211 and 4705

Here's the same picture for comparison on the two devices. It took about 20 tries. Hard to take it in focus and not have glare. I'm no photographer, that's for sure.

It's high res. Feel free to download it. I suspect the site where I posted it will take it down.


http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/gy...x/p1010066.jpg


The screen protectors were off both devices.
Both devices were turned up to maximum brightness.

My impression is the 4705 looks marginally better, but it's a minimal difference, and I am biased.

Will update on battery as soon as I can.


Hope this helps.

Last edited by gylman; 02-18-08 at 01:16 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Sponsor Ads
Old 02-18-08, 12:22 PM   #2 (permalink)
mingkee
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I like 211 better abit, but barely noticeable
I wouldn't disassemble my 211 to find out whether the LCD is same as HX4700
(it may be a forbidden question, but I'd like to ask)
which WM version you use on HX4700?
if it's WM6, how is the a2dp performance, as well as SD-HC support?
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-08, 12:30 PM   #3 (permalink)
gylman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mingkee, I use WM 2003 SE for my 4700. I still find it best, but remember that I mostly use my IPAQ as a document reader, video viewer, and PDA. I rarely use the Wifi and never use the email.

I tried WM 2005 and it was so horrible, and so much hassle, that I have given up. My 4700 does exactly everything I need, and I have never heard or seen anything to suggest that I need the more recent versions of WM.

I like new hardware, but I hate new software (because so often it fails to deliver on the promise of the hardware). I still use Windows 2000 on my main PC, and think it is much more stable than XP and infinitely better than Vista (which is an unmitigated disaster).
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-08, 03:10 PM   #4 (permalink)
LocutusBorgMan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks for the comparison pictures. I think the 211 looks slightly better.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-08, 03:13 PM   #5 (permalink)
gylman
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Somehow, in real life, the 4700 seems sharper.

Looking at the photo myself, I don't really get that sense. I agree that the colours seem slightly richer in the 211 in the photo. Don't forget you are comparing an over 3 year old screen with a brand new screen.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-08, 03:15 PM   #6 (permalink)
LocutusBorgMan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Maybe the black edge on the 211 creates better contrast with the picture and thus it makes it look a bit sharper on the 211
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-08, 03:01 AM   #7 (permalink)
Contributing Reviewer
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,572
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Could you re-make the pics in (almost) absolute darkness? Like in my similar articles http://www.winmobiletech.com/SCREENQUALITY/ and http://www.winmobiletech.com/VSHX4700/ ?

(Note that the latter article has some shots with flash. do NOT use flash.)
__________________
MS MVP- Mobile Devices.
Menneisyys is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
211, 4705, comparison, side

Sponsor Ads

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2003-09 LeckMedia, LLC