That's the main question Daniel Gentleman asks readers in a very good article where he explains the differences between UMPCs and MIDs. Even when the title of his article could sound more like a Windows-Linux debate, it's more between what works better for you in your everyday Internet Mobile needs, a shrunk PC or a non-PC. Here is a comparison from Daniel's article that you can use to find what is better for you.
Now we have two potential mobile Internet solutions: Shrink a PC down to where it is mobile yet still usable (a UMPC) or build a non-PC device from the ground up (a MID or Internet Tablet) specifically for mobile Internet use.
Shrinking a PC
-
Advantages
-
Disadvantages
-
Cost of PC class hardware
-
Cost of commercial operating system license
-
Constant compromises in either speed, size, or battery life.
Building a mobile Internet device
-
Advantages
-
All hardware, software, and user interaction built to go together
-
Cheaper hardware and no operating system licensing costs
-
Wide community-based software and support
-
Disadvantages
Editor's Note: For me the answer is only one: a UMPC. I need more than Internet even in my daily job as news editor of this and other pages. I need to be able to manipulate pictures, run tools like Windows Live Writer, Frontpage, etc. For me to have a few "ported" applications is not enough if I can have virtually millions of them free or commercial. In my case going with Linux would be like going back to Windows CE. The reason why I bought my first UMPC was because the Pocket PC Platform was not powerful enough to cover all my needs. So... why go back to that same situation but with a different OS, in this case Linux which practically does not have any support.
View Original Blog Post