|
|
#1 (permalink) | ||||
|
Aximsite Minor League
|
MP3 vs OGG
How much of a difference in file size would I get if I converted my mp3's to Ogg's. Is it worth it? Say, for example, a 3.5 MB file. About what would that equate to as an OGG file with comparable bitrate (say 128 or 192). Thanks.
| ||||
|
|
|
| sponsor links |
|
|
#2 (permalink) | ||||||
|
Aximsite Elite ![]()
|
Quote:
Here is an example: - A file encoded as a 164kps MP3 and is 4 minutes long will be: (164kpsx240secs)=3.94mb - A file encoded as a 164kps OGG Vorbis and is 4 minutes long will be: (164kpsx240secs)=3.94mb So no saving in space - as you are using the same kps per second using both codecs. HOWEVER, using OGG Vorbis you can encode the file @ 96kps and it will sound the same (IMHO) as MP3 @ 164kps, therefore to get the SAME QUALITY music file on your system: MP3= 3.9mb OGG Vorbis= (240*96)=2.3mb A saving in space of 42% The saving comes in the ability to encode a file that will still sound the same but at a lower bitrate. I hope that makes sense. | ||||||
|
Regards
Rob |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |||||
|
Aximsite All Star
|
Correct me if I am wrong but if you do it at the same bit rate it will be the same file size... roughly the same file size anyway (slightly different header information may change the size slighty). I would expect the only difference you will get is the audio quality.
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||||
|
Aximsite Minor League
|
Quote:
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |||||||
|
Aximsite Legend ![]()
|
Because the sampling and reduction algorithms are better.
However - you would be MUCH MUCH better to re-rip from CD to OGG than convert to OGG from MP3. It's like re-photocopying an original docuemnt vs photocopying a photocopy. Every generation loses integrity. | |||||||
|
Always read stuff that will make you look good if you die in the middle of it.
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | ||||||
|
Aximsite All Star ![]()
|
Quote:
![]() | ||||||
|
Life is its own answer....
SkypeName: aximfrog |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||||||
|
Aximsite Elite ![]()
|
Quote:
Quote:
| |||||||
|
Regards
Rob |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | ||||||
|
Aximsite Elite ![]()
|
Quote:
Have a look - HERE for more details. | ||||||
|
Regards
Rob |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | ||||||
|
Aximsite All Star ![]()
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() | ||||||
|
Life is its own answer....
SkypeName: aximfrog |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) | ||||||
|
Aximsite Elite ![]()
|
Quote:
I ripped all my CD's to Ogg twice - once at 280kps and again at 80kps - this allows me to listen to 280kps from my PC - as space isn't an issue (and I am hoping to set it up a central media server)- and also at 80kps on my PPC Also I cannot really tell the difference between the following: - CD ripped to 80kps and - CD ripped to 280kps and later convert a copy to 80kps I believe that this doesn't suffer (as much) from the 'photocopying' problem as much as you are using the same codec to perform both conversions So you may want to rip using 280kps to your PC (or similar) and then covert down for use on you PPC. | ||||||
|
Regards
Rob |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |||||
|
Aximsite Minor League
|
Quote:
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |||||||
|
Aximsite Veteran ![]()
|
I guess I'm just a bit hesitant to begin re-ripping my CD collection. Mp3s are still the universal format played by pretty much every player...Sony has had its attempt at making ATRAC the format, there was another version of Mp3 (pro?) out there, and now OGG. I know the audiophiles will support just about any format other than Mp3, but I'm seldom in a situation where I need the perfect clarity of the original recording...128 kps usually works well for me. OGG may be better...but until it plays on all my players...I'm sticking with Mp3 files.
| |||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | ||||||
|
Aximsite Elite ![]()
|
Quote:
That left me with two choices .wma or .ogg and the biggest problem with .wma is you never know if all the files you have already ripped will work with the next version of MS's software - so for me the choice was easy ![]() | ||||||
|
Regards
Rob |
|||||||
|
|
|
![]() |
| sponsor links |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|