Register Forums Today's Posts Reviews Gallery Video Vault Downloads Resources Shopping
Go Back   Mobility Site > PocketPC Software Forums > Third Party Software and Mods > Multimedia

Multimedia Talk/Review Multimedia Apps for Dell's Axim. Mp3/DivX

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-22-04, 09:01 AM   #1 (permalink)
Aximsite Minor League
 
basketkase543's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 111
PDA: Axim x50 mid
iTrader Rating: (0)
MP3 vs OGG

How much of a difference in file size would I get if I converted my mp3's to Ogg's. Is it worth it? Say, for example, a 3.5 MB file. About what would that equate to as an OGG file with comparable bitrate (say 128 or 192). Thanks.
basketkase543 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
sponsor links


Old 11-22-04, 09:07 AM   #2 (permalink)
Aximsite Elite

 
rob1303's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,275
Location: Sydney, Australia
PDA: iPaq Hx4700
iTrader Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by basketkase543
How much of a difference in file size would I get if I converted my mp3's to Ogg's. Is it worth it? Say, for example, a 3.5 MB file. About what would that equate to as an OGG file with comparable bitrate (say 128 or 192). Thanks.
If you use the same bitrate - the file will be the same size.

Here is an example:

- A file encoded as a 164kps MP3 and is 4 minutes long will be: (164kpsx240secs)=3.94mb
- A file encoded as a 164kps OGG Vorbis and is 4 minutes long will be: (164kpsx240secs)=3.94mb

So no saving in space - as you are using the same kps per second using both codecs.

HOWEVER, using OGG Vorbis you can encode the file @ 96kps and it will sound the same (IMHO) as MP3 @ 164kps, therefore to get the SAME QUALITY music file on your system:
MP3= 3.9mb
OGG Vorbis= (240*96)=2.3mb

A saving in space of 42%

The saving comes in the ability to encode a file that will still sound the same but at a lower bitrate.

I hope that makes sense.
Regards

Rob

Bronze Poster Top Notch MyPDA 

rob1303 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-04, 09:09 AM   #3 (permalink)
Aximsite All Star
 
Adrian Knack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 945
Location: Australia
PDA: X50v
iTrader Rating: (0)
Correct me if I am wrong but if you do it at the same bit rate it will be the same file size... roughly the same file size anyway (slightly different header information may change the size slighty). I would expect the only difference you will get is the audio quality.
Adrian Knack is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-04, 06:57 PM   #4 (permalink)
Aximsite Minor League
 
basketkase543's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 111
PDA: Axim x50 mid
iTrader Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rob1303
If you use the same bitrate - the file will be the same size.

Here is an example:

- A file encoded as a 164kps MP3 and is 4 minutes long will be: (164kpsx240secs)=3.94mb
- A file encoded as a 164kps OGG Vorbis and is 4 minutes long will be: (164kpsx240secs)=3.94mb

So no saving in space - as you are using the same kps per second using both codecs.

HOWEVER, using OGG Vorbis you can encode the file @ 96kps and it will sound the same (IMHO) as MP3 @ 164kps, therefore to get the SAME QUALITY music file on your system:
MP3= 3.9mb
OGG Vorbis= (240*96)=2.3mb

A saving in space of 42%

The saving comes in the ability to encode a file that will still sound the same but at a lower bitrate.

I hope that makes sense.
Wow, very detailed answer! Thanks. I still have one more question though: If an OGG file is at a lower bit rate than an MP3 how can it sound the same? What am I missing here?
basketkase543 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-04, 07:26 PM   #5 (permalink)
Aximsite Legend

 
Howard2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 14,113
Location: Toronto, Canada
PDA: Blackberry 8830
PMP: 30GB iPod with Video
iTrader Rating: (0)
View MyPDA
Because the sampling and reduction algorithms are better.

However - you would be MUCH MUCH better to re-rip from CD to OGG than convert to OGG from MP3.

It's like re-photocopying an original docuemnt vs photocopying a photocopy.

Every generation loses integrity.
Always read stuff that will make you look good if you die in the middle of it.

Aximsite Active Silver Member Moderator Medal Silver Poster 

Howard2k is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-04, 07:35 PM   #6 (permalink)
Aximsite Minor League
 
basketkase543's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 111
PDA: Axim x50 mid
iTrader Rating: (0)
Sounds good. So than overall OGG seems like a much better format. Are there any downsides to it or should I just do all my ripping as OGG from now on?
basketkase543 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-04, 08:07 PM   #7 (permalink)
Aximsite All Star

 
DavidLennartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 976
Location: California
PDA: Axim X30H, Visor
iTrader Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by basketkase543
Sounds good. So than overall OGG seems like a much better format. Are there any downsides to it or should I just do all my ripping as OGG from now on?
Please be forebearing of a newbie question here...I know what Mp3s are...but what is an OGG????? (sounds like a mispronounced form of something used to make omelletes! lol
Life is its own answer....
SkypeName: aximfrog



Aximsite Bronze Contributors 

DavidLennartz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-04, 08:17 PM   #8 (permalink)
Aximsite Elite

 
rob1303's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,275
Location: Sydney, Australia
PDA: iPaq Hx4700
iTrader Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard2k
However - you would be MUCH MUCH better to re-rip from CD to OGG than convert to OGG from MP3.
Thanks Howard - I should have mentioned that as well

Quote:
Originally Posted by basketkase543
Sounds good. So than overall OGG seems like a much better format. Are there any downsides to it or should I just do all my ripping as OGG from now on?
The only real downside (IMHO) is cross-compatability is still a bit limited - i.e. players such as iPod do not play OGG files - although the list of available players is growing daily
Regards

Rob

Bronze Poster Top Notch MyPDA 

rob1303 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-04, 08:23 PM   #9 (permalink)
Aximsite Elite

 
rob1303's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,275
Location: Sydney, Australia
PDA: iPaq Hx4700
iTrader Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidLennartz
Please be forebearing of a newbie question here...I know what Mp3s are...but what is an OGG????? (sounds like a mispronounced form of something used to make omelletes! lol
Ogg - is the file extention used by music files created with the open sourced OGG Vorbis music encoder (other - not necessarily opened sourced - musical formats are .wma, .mp3, .wav .mid etc)

Have a look - HERE for more details.
Regards

Rob

Bronze Poster Top Notch MyPDA 

rob1303 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-04, 08:26 PM   #10 (permalink)
Aximsite All Star

 
DavidLennartz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 976
Location: California
PDA: Axim X30H, Visor
iTrader Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rob1303
Ogg - is the file extention used by music files created with the open sourced OGG Vorbis music encoder (other - not necessarily opened sourced - musical formats are .wma, .mp3, .wav .mid etc)

Have a look - HERE for more details.
Thanks
Life is its own answer....
SkypeName: aximfrog



Aximsite Bronze Contributors 

DavidLennartz is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-04, 08:45 PM   #11 (permalink)
Aximsite Minor League
 
basketkase543's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 111
PDA: Axim x50 mid
iTrader Rating: (0)
Thanks so much for everyone's help. Now to re-rip my cds to OGG.
basketkase543 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-04, 09:22 PM   #12 (permalink)
Aximsite Elite

 
rob1303's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,275
Location: Sydney, Australia
PDA: iPaq Hx4700
iTrader Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by basketkase543
Thanks so much for everyone's help. Now to re-rip my cds to OGG.
Just a tip

I ripped all my CD's to Ogg twice - once at 280kps and again at 80kps

- this allows me to listen to 280kps from my PC - as space isn't an issue (and I am hoping to set it up a central media server)- and also at 80kps on my PPC (it just saves time to do them all at once.

Also I cannot really tell the difference between the following:

- CD ripped to 80kps and
- CD ripped to 280kps and later convert a copy to 80kps

I believe that this doesn't suffer (as much) from the 'photocopying' problem as much as you are using the same codec to perform both conversions

So you may want to rip using 280kps to your PC (or similar) and then covert down for use on you PPC.
Regards

Rob

Bronze Poster Top Notch MyPDA 

rob1303 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-04, 09:37 PM   #13 (permalink)
Aximsite Minor League
 
basketkase543's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 111
PDA: Axim x50 mid
iTrader Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by rob1303
Just a tip

I ripped all my CD's to Ogg twice - once at 280kps and again at 80kps

- this allows me to listen to 280kps from my PC - as space isn't an issue (and I am hoping to set it up a central media server)- and also at 80kps on my PPC (it just saves time to do them all at once.

Also I cannot really tell the difference between the following:

- CD ripped to 80kps and
- CD ripped to 280kps and later convert a copy to 80kps

I believe that this doesn't suffer (as much) from the 'photocopying' problem as much as you are using the same codec to perform both conversions

So you may want to rip using 280kps to your PC (or similar) and then covert down for use on you PPC.
Thanks for the tip, I'll definately give it a try!
basketkase543 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-04, 10:27 PM   #14 (permalink)
Aximsite Veteran

 
Choirguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,443
Location: Minnesota
PDA: N/A
Phone: Apple iPhone 3G
Laptop: MacBook (Unibody)
iTrader Rating: (1)
I guess I'm just a bit hesitant to begin re-ripping my CD collection. Mp3s are still the universal format played by pretty much every player...Sony has had its attempt at making ATRAC the format, there was another version of Mp3 (pro?) out there, and now OGG. I know the audiophiles will support just about any format other than Mp3, but I'm seldom in a situation where I need the perfect clarity of the original recording...128 kps usually works well for me. OGG may be better...but until it plays on all my players...I'm sticking with Mp3 files.

Aximsite Active Bronze Member 

Choirguy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-04, 11:18 PM   #15 (permalink)
Aximsite Elite

 
rob1303's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 9,275
Location: Sydney, Australia
PDA: iPaq Hx4700
iTrader Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Choirguy
I guess I'm just a bit hesitant to begin re-ripping my CD collection. Mp3s are still the universal format played by pretty much every player...Sony has had its attempt at making ATRAC the format, there was another version of Mp3 (pro?) out there, and now OGG. I know the audiophiles will support just about any format other than Mp3, but I'm seldom in a situation where I need the perfect clarity of the original recording...128 kps usually works well for me. OGG may be better...but until it plays on all my players...I'm sticking with Mp3 files.
I actually don't disagree with any of this - I only found ogg format AFTER I had bought my PPC and I was looking at getting the best quality sound for the smallest file that I could.

That left me with two choices .wma or .ogg and the biggest problem with .wma is you never know if all the files you have already ripped will work with the next version of MS's software - so for me the choice was easy
Regards

Rob

Bronze Poster Top Notch MyPDA 

rob1303 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

sponsor links



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 PM.