Register Forums Today's Posts Reviews Gallery Video Vault Downloads Resources Shopping
Go Back   Mobility Site > Other Mobile Hardware > Hardware Accessories > Storage Card Forum

Storage Card Forum Talk about CF, SD, and Microdrives. What's good, what's bad? - No Ads

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-05-04, 11:32 AM   #1 (permalink)
Aximsite Rookie
 
NachoDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 60
Location: Montreal, Canada
iTrader Rating: (0)
CF or SD?

What are the pros and cons to each? Why the need for CF expansions if most ipaqs come with the SD slot?
"A One that is not cold, is scarcely a One at all"

-Strong Bad
NachoDog is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
sponsor links


Old 11-05-04, 11:58 AM   #2 (permalink)
Aximsite Hall of Fame

 
whitelyt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,217
Location: Detroit, MI
iTrader Rating: (0)
Most people would say the CF is on its way out. Certainly SD is much more appealing because it is more compact. However CF will be around for awhile. Atleast for me CF expansion is important because there are CF accessories on the market that is not offered in SD. Also higher capacity cards are available in CF. Whether affordable or not you can get CF cards above 8GB in size. SD cards are just getting to 2GB. Capacity is important to some people and CF can offer higher capacity. Plus CF cards are faster in some cases.
Ted Whitely
whitelyt at ipaqhq DOT com

HP rx3715
Dell Axim X50v
HP 2215
Dell Axim X30

Bronze Poster 

whitelyt is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-04, 01:24 PM   #3 (permalink)
Aximsite Rookie
 
Kenundrum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 305
PDA: Ipaq hx4700
iTrader Rating: (0)
i used to swear by SD cards, never owned a CF card in my life... but now that i have a dual slot pda again, i'm back in the market and wondering about cf now that i actually have a need for 4gb on my pda- for dvd movies
Kenundrum is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-04, 07:13 PM   #4 (permalink)
Aximsite Minor League
 
imported_Pogi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 211
Location: Sydney, Australia
iTrader Rating: (0)
CF
pros: higher capacity, can be faster than sd
cons: microdrives are slow bulky compared to sd cards

SD
pros: higher compatibility with other tech gadgets (cameras, laptops, etc.)
cons: more expensive, can be slower than cf, limited to 2GB

why the need for a compact flash expansion sleeve? GPS, wifi are better suited to be used using the CF slot as the width of the card is less prone to being broken, rather than a sd powered gps or wifi card..
Fight the stereotype: Don't be an Idiot
imported_Pogi is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-04, 10:26 AM   #5 (permalink)
Aximsite Rookie
 
MACMANIA4U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 203
iTrader Rating: (0)
I've switched from Palm to PPC and now that a have CF, I can't live without it.
MACMANIA4U is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-04, 11:52 AM   #6 (permalink)
Aximsite Minor League
 
linguistdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 253
iTrader Rating: (0)
you need CF and SD simply because it lets you have more memory than SD alone
linguistdude is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-04, 12:45 PM   #7 (permalink)
Aximsite Hall of Fame


 
Cheryl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,836
Location: Michigan
PDA: X51v, X50v, x5 & HP 2215
Phone: Kyocera Strobe
Carrier: Alltell
Laptop: Sony Vaio
iTrader Rating: (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by linguistdude
you need CF and SD simply because it lets you have more memory than SD alone
That's my belief . Two slots are better than one!
It's that time of year again. I need a new holiday avatar... Is there anyone up to the challenge?

Bronze Poster 

Cheryl is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-05, 11:34 PM   #8 (permalink)
Aximsite Prospect
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 9
iTrader Rating: (0)
For me it's pretty simple. On my 2215 I love the dual slots because it allows me to use a 5gig Seagate CF microdrive (movies, music, pictures, whatever) as well as using the SD slot for a WiFi card. I also use an old 256mb SD card for periodic system back ups. Best of all worlds.

Now if I could just solve the pathetic battery life issue.
Dreamer 66 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-05, 11:53 AM   #9 (permalink)
Aximsite Major League
 
slashlos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 445
Location: Long Island
iTrader Rating: (0)
ensure we're comparing apples to apples

Correct me if I'm wrong, but does CF always mean the same as a microdrive? I had thought that CF was a media format, slightly larger than SD, while a microdrive was an actual harddisk, packaged with a CF interface. The distinction I think would be power consumption (higher for microdrive) and stability (better for non microdrive), and capacity (higher for microdrive). Given the complexity of having a moving mechanism, I'd also suspect that microdrive based CF storage to be more expensive.

With that said, in the previous discussions, are we talking about solid state CF memory vs. SD (implied to be solid state, non-volatile)?
/los "I was a teenage net-random"
slashlos is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-05, 02:42 PM   #10 (permalink)
Aximsite Prospect
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 9
iTrader Rating: (0)
[QUOTE=slashlos]Correct me if I'm wrong, but does CF always mean the same as a microdrive? I had thought that CF was a media format, slightly larger than SD, while a microdrive was an actual harddisk, packaged with a CF interface. The distinction I think would be power consumption (higher for microdrive) and stability (better for non microdrive), and capacity (higher for microdrive). Given the complexity of having a moving mechanism, I'd also suspect that microdrive based CF storage to be more expensive. [QUOTE=slashlos]

Microdrive is actually less expensive and likely to become even cheaper as ecconimies of scale kick in.

Though CF literally means compact 'flash' (as in flash RAM memory chips) I've always just refered to it as a form factor.
Dreamer 66 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-26-05, 10:54 PM   #11 (permalink)
Aximsite Prospect
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5
iTrader Rating: (0)
Hi I have a new 1 gig compact flash card that when inserted doesn't come up in the memory storage dropdown list but if I insert a 256 MB card it reads it without problem. Any ideas why the 1GB card isn't reconized?

cjssr
cjssr is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-05, 05:04 AM   #12 (permalink)
Aximsite Minor League

 
colinkhalid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 287
Location: Kent, U.K
PDA: Axim X5
iTrader Rating: (0)
Main 2 reasons for dual slots would be 1. extra storage 2. add ons.

but from what I can see built in bluetooth is more important than a CF slot for such things as GPS, Modems. CF is on the way out few camera's use it, so its only important if you need vast storage space. IMHO
Axim 400
WM03
512 CF
256 SD
Dell Trumobile wireless CF
Pretec CF modem
Netgear wireless access point
Cable Modem
Motorola MPX 200 mobile phone
colinkhalid is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-05, 08:53 PM   #13 (permalink)
Aximsite Rookie
 
SonicJMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 91
iTrader Rating: (0)
I usually use CF for "things" (GPS, USB host, camera, presenter, or any other thing that'll plug in to it) and SD for memory. Reason being is that things break easier if they are thinner, and memory is easier to carry if it's tiny.
Also, with my devices being CF, I can snap them in to an adapter for PCMCIA (PC Card).
SonicJMC is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-05, 12:02 PM   #14 (permalink)
Aximsite Prospect
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 10
iTrader Rating: (0)
So anyone knows approximately how much faster CFs are than SDs? I was always curious to know because I never saw speed measurements when reading their specifications. I only have an SD card and it stores all my files and GPS maps. I'm getting a CF soon and now I'm thinking about putting my maps on the CF since it's faster. Am I on the right track?
vedau is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-05, 01:43 PM   #15 (permalink)
Aximsite Prospect
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 76
iTrader Rating: (0)
Truthfully I dont really see any difference on my ipaq between CF and SD. Kinda like how I don't see any difference between my regular CF and my camera's high speed CF
JickBahTech is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

sponsor links



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:58 AM.