Kingmax slow, dell Mmc good!

[shadohh]

I tested my 256mb Kingmax

Read is .79mb/s
write is .02mb/s


Atari 16mb mmc form dell

Read is .68mb/s
write is .86mb/s


^^

I hope my Lexar 1gb x32 performs well

[MACMANIA4U]

TRY the spb benchmark card test instead, pocket mechanic bench ain't that great
Then go and compare you results with this page
http://www.core-sound.com/CF-and-SD-...omparison.html

[shadohh]

Originally Posted by MACMANIA4U

TRY the spb benchmark card test instead, pocket mechanic bench ain't that great
Then go and compare you results with this page
http://www.core-sound.com/CF-and-SD-...omparison.html

I dont like spb performance.

The statistics sheet it makes its meaningless to me.

[shadohh]

Welp. Got my Lexar x32

Tested it with pocket mechanic.


Got a .89 mb read

.08 mb write.


Its sad how the dell mmc is better then a lexar x32

[shadohh]

mmm

Now I am getting 1.23 read
.34 write.

[Choirguy]

You're getting the second set of figures with which card?

[shadohh]

If I pop in the DELL MMC

and do a test

then toss in the lexar I get a better score from the lexar.


hmmm

Either the SD slot is being odd or the software is goofy.

[littlerichie29]

or you are comparing 2 completely different cards. To get accurate results, the cards must be of equal size, and type.

[shadohh]

Not true.


the factor here is.

Lexar x32 should be showing up with a 4.8 speed ^^

And the fact that a dell MMC is showing up better means there is something going on.

[MACMANIA4U]

Now do you see why i say to use spb...

[shadohh]

Originally Posted by MACMANIA4U

Now do you see why i say to use spb...

spb makes some goofy xml file and I cant find anything to view it.

I tried using excel and it didnt like it.