Maybe I misunderstood....
I was thinking that all
CF Type II cards use a Microdrive, hence the extra thickness. But I no longer think that is the case. Here is some more info I found on
Microdrives after a google search. Good point on power consumption. My guess is that prices on high capacity
CF cards have dropped to the point where Microdrives are no longer cost competitive.
I'm thinking the card must clearly be labeled Microdrive if that is the technology it uses. Just because it is a
CF Type II card, it does not mean it is a Microdrive. Is that right?
If that is the case, I think I'll go with a
CF Type II card so I won't have a big
gap.