To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Sorry, not my lists. As I mentioned on the top of the list. It is from my fav mag Maxim... :)
Stop the bus!!
you can't have an objective discussion of intelligence based on tallness or shortness if height is relative. What criteria did they use for who is tall and who is short?
first, like it or not, this study shows that, in general, the taller you are the more intelligent you are.
second @howard: I don't know somewhere around 6'1", not to freakishly tall not to freakishly short, but then not average. RIGHT THERE IN THE SWEET SPOT, imo
third: that list of short peps. the study didn't show relative heights and success. so sorry but the 5'10" person is right there at being average height.
__________________
__________________
In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock.
Not willing to spend five dollars to read the whole report but it looks like it may boil down to nutrition which sparked the height and the mental developement. But there would be a lot of variables here, if genetically your defined height would be 5'-9" with perfect nutrition when young and you reach it presumably you would be smarter than someone who's genetic height would be 6'-4" but only reaches 6'.
Follow Us
RSS Feed
Follow on Twitter
Facebook
YouTube
