Originally Posted by jcrayford
|
|
Still, respecting everyone's views, I can't totally agree with Anti-hunters, as I have read the research regarding conservation and the importance that hunter's harversts play each and every year..... For instance, did you know that more Grizzlies are killed each year BY THEIR OWN KIND than hunters would be capable of? Males (boars) tend to kill off the young to bring the females back into heat - even killing their own (the boars) offspring. So for an Anti-hunter to say that I, as a hunter, do more damage to populations than anything else is ridiculous....
|
I'm not sure that is relevant.
Humans are killed
by their own kind far more than they are killed by any other animal. Would you then accept a different (and necessarily hypothetical) species having moral immunity to kill as many humans for sport as they wish simply because humans kill other humans? I see no connection.
Trophy hunting is not about relative evil; it's just evil. Humans have long equated the
power to do something with the
right to do something, and that extends to all walks of life. Until we evolve beyond that, we will remain (collectively) the most barbarous and destructive creature ever to have lived on this planet.