Is this a personal observation or is there a study out there to support this claim?
|
Originally Posted by jmckie
|
|
To me they are a necessary evil in order to protect the fragile screen. But from an engineering standpoint, they truly ruin a lot of the painstaking research and development that went into your PDA.
|
If the engineers hate cases so much, why didn't they design the unit to better protect the fragile screen? If they don't want you to use a case, make it so we don't have to.
|
Quote:
|
|
The battery cover was designed to be easily removed and replaced. Not anymore if you have a case.
|
No, the battery case is still easily removed. You just have to take the unit out of it's case first. How often do you have to access your battery?
|
Quote:
|
|
Engineers keep pushing the envelope on the operating system as well as the CPU to make the PDA faster and faster. Information should be accessible in an instant. You don't want to wait when you want to check your appointments or look up a phone number. But now you have to open the case before you use it. So much for that fast CPU.
|
Huh? This sounds like a straw man argument. Do you have your PDA glued to your hand so it is always there providing you information? So I now have to spend an addition 1-2 seconds opening my case. Even without the case I have to spend that much time in picking up my PDA that I dropped because there was no way engineered into it to for carrying it around.
|
Quote:
|
|
It makes using certain cradles, specially auto mounts, rather inconvenient.
|
Based on your agrument, engineers designed the perfect unit so there shouldn't be a need for cradles or auto mounts. They just add weight and tie down a portable device.
|
Quote:
|
|
Ergonomics: you are forced to use two hands to use the PDA when sometimes one hand operation would have been possible.
|
Hmm...... It take me one hand just to hold the unit, with or without a case.