Howard2k

Originally Posted by aximbigfan

but he is not JUST acting like a kid... he is screwing kids!!! chris

Not sure if you heard, but they announced a verdict in the Jackson case.

MrKlaatu

:approve:

JMJSelect

The US court system found Jackson Innocent but he will always be guilty in americas eyes.

previous settlements for the same accusation? Announcing on the tele that he thinks its charming for a 40 year old to sleep with a 13 year old boy? porno mags of barely legal(very very suprised by this. because thats a girl nudity mag)? and on and on.

i cannot believe the jury called innocent on the alcohol given to a minor. thats just crazy. on every other count though the prosecution team didnt do a good job.

anyways just my two cents

__________________
__________________
In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock.

aximbigfan

Originally Posted by Howard2k

Not sure if you heard, but they announced a verdict in the Jackson case.

..... there is a differnce between what actully happened and what the jury thinks based on what they think is evedence.l ...


chris

JMJSelect

Quote:

If we lock people up for acting like kids, shall we lock up people who cannot spell too?

if you cannot spell you need to be in jail

__________________
__________________
In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock.

Howard2k

Originally Posted by aximbigfan

..... there is a differnce between what actully happened and what the jury thinks based on what they think is evedence.l ... chris

Just so we're clear - you think that as a minor who had absolutely no direct contact with either the defense or the prosecution, were not there for any of the incidents, had no insider information on the case, did not sit on the jury and do not know anyone who was, you know more about what happened than the jury?

__________________
Always read stuff that will make you look good if you die in the middle of it.

MrKlaatu

.
.
The Poster didn't see the credulity of Post #38, either, Howard.
.
.
.
.

__________________

Howard2k

Incredible.... :)

__________________
Always read stuff that will make you look good if you die in the middle of it.

JMJSelect

hey is jackson leaving the US????? he said he would if he was proved innocent. im starting a new thread on this

__________________
__________________
In matters of style, swim with the current; in matters of principle, stand like a rock.

aximbigfan

Originally Posted by Howard2k

Just so we're clear - you think that as a minor who had absolutely no direct contact with either the defense or the prosecution, were not there for any of the incidents, had no insider information on the case, did not sit on the jury and do not know anyone who was, you know more about what happened than the jury?

..no, i am saying that MJ may not have been twlling the truth. and if he had been not telling the truth then what evedence is there to support the jurys conclusion? if he melested the kid then there would not be any evedence. i mean this case is tough because there is no way to prove that he did it. i mean to say that there is no phisical evedence.



chris

MrKlaatu

Originally Posted by JMJSelect

hey is jackson leaving the US????? he said he would if he was proved innocent. im starting a new thread on this

Yeah, I saw it.

You're Thread Title is way out of line.

Jukov

But he didn't need to prove he didn't, the prosecution needed to prove he did

MrKlaatu

Originally Posted by aximbigfan

..no, i am saying that MJ may not have been twlling the truth. and if he had been not telling the truth then what evedence is there to support the jurys conclusion? if he melested the kid then there would not be any evedence. i mean this case is tough because there is no way to prove that he did it. i mean to say that there is no phisical evedence. chris

Chris; This is what the whole trial was all about and a Jury of his Peers, after much hard work over many days, found him innocent.

You may not believe it, but this is why we have a Legal System, to determine these things when there is no overwhelming evidence.

Please reread Post #38.
.
.
.
.

MrKlaatu

.
.
Excellent point, Jukov! :approve:
.
.
.
.

__________________

Howard2k

Originally Posted by aximbigfan

..no, i am saying that MJ may not have been twlling the truth. and if he had been not telling the truth then what evedence is there to support the jurys conclusion? if he melested the kid then there would not be any evedence. i mean this case is tough because there is no way to prove that he did it. i mean to say that there is no phisical evedence. chris

You are totally missing the point of the legal system.

Not to mention that he didn't even take the stand!! So who did he lie to? Guess you're "expert" opinion isn't that expert after all ;)

__________________
Always read stuff that will make you look good if you die in the middle of it.