Dell does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Community Forum, regardless of who originates that content.
What Dell-Rollie says doesn't matter, not anything else you read on the forums.
Originally posted by as77 This doesn't change the fact that you deliberately and dishonestly edited your previous quotation from the document. I do not appreciate this.
I didn't edit anything. I didn't change anything that was written. I don't have to quote the whole page to prove my point. I quoted the sentence that proved my point. The next one doesn't prove anything different.
Quote:
BTW what you say doesn't matter.
I guess because it proves that Dell isn't liable for what they say on their forums.
Originally posted by cageyjames I didn't edit anything. I didn't change anything that was written. I don't have to quote the whole page to prove my point. I quoted the sentence that proved my point. The next one doesn't prove anything different.
No, cagey. You omitted the second half of a single sentence, thereby changing the meaning of the sentence. The original, full sentence did not support your point. It supported my point.
Originally posted by as77 No, cagey. You omitted the second half of a single sentence, thereby changing the meaning of the sentence. The original, full sentence did not support your point. It supported my point.
OK, but if I am guilty of what you say I am, you are too for not including...
Quote:
Dell does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, reliability, completeness, usefulness, non-infringement of intellectual property rights, or quality of any content on the Community Forum, regardless of who originates that content.
Please, the fact that we both didn't quote the whole page doesn't change the fact of this discussion that Dell isn't liable for what they say.
Omitting part of a sentence, changing its meaning to the opposite is quite a bit different from omitting another part of the document. I would not have complained if you had included the second part of that sentence.
I think that the text is inconsistent and it is really wierd. In one paragraph it says that Dell is not responsible for what third parties are posting in the forums, etc. Then in another paragraph it says that Dell is not responsible for anything, regardless of who posts it. This just doesn't make sense. It also says that the moderators are authorized representatives of Dell. If you put this together, the result is that Dell is not responsible for what an authorized representative of Dell says. Which I find a bit wierd. What is the meaning of authorization and representation then?
Since the text is self-contradictory, I have my doubts about its value if Dell tried to use it in an actual legal procedure.
__________________
Chris Leckness, Microsoft MVP Windows Mobile To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Follow Us
RSS Feed
Follow on Twitter
Facebook
YouTube
