|
I live in Quebec, and what I think they are trying to envoke is the Consumer Protection price protection laws:
In Quebec (and perhaps elsewhere in Canada?), the Consumer Protection Dep't has some laws put in place to protect the consumer from being charged more than the advertised price.
This can be seen more often on a retail level: grocery stores, department stores, etc. , where scanned checkout price may not actully be shelf price. Retailers must just love it - as they are obliged to display large posters at the cashes, explaining the law and how it works.
The way it works is that if the error occurs on an item worth less than $10.00, the item must be given for free. If the item is worth more than $10.00, the price must be adjusted to reflect the actual price, plus an additional $10.00 is deducted.
I buy a jar of mayonnaise that shows $2.99 on the shelf. When scanned at the cash, it rings in at $3.29. I go AHEM, point at the price, then they do their little price check thing, and then I walk out with 32oz. of free mayonnaise happiness.
I buy a DVD on special for $24.99, down from $29.99. It scans at the higher price. In this case, they must honor the advertised $24.99, plus give an additional $10 for restitution....$14.99 dvd, not too shabby.
But in this Dell case:
Errors on a webpage that are corrected within a few days probably don't have much chance in court (just as any newspaper ad with an error...they publish a correction notice within a couple of days, its done.)
They also list Olivier Dumoulin as a plaintiff- hmmm, could he be related to the Dumoulin electronics store chain, perhaps some bad blood between Dell & Dumoulin stores, or maybe just a coincidence?
|