|
Quote:
|
Originally posted by starforce_chips
I don't think that Dell lowered the multiplier on the processor speed "because of price." It doesn't make sense. Why offer a very capable processor , no matter what you step it down to, along with an Axim for cheap? I think the other stuff on the circuit board is cheap. The chipset, firmware, or whatever else was good enough for 2002 but not 2003.
|
It makes a lot of sense. For example, if Intel makes a batch of chips and 40% are tested to run at 3 ghz and the rest fail, but pass the testing for 2.4ghz they may in fact sell 3 ghz processors as 2.4 ghz processors. If all the 2.4 ghz chips sell and there are still 3 ghz rated chips left (as is often the case due to demand at a certain price) intel will badge some faster 3 gz chips as 2.4 ghz because a chip that is sold always brings in more money then one that is not.
Also, binning (the testing process to determine what chips will do what) costs money. If they make a chip that will do 400 mhz with a very high yield its cheaper to just criple a fast chip rather then testing for slower chips.
They may bin chips out to get the faster 400 mhz chips, but it is not likely as its more expensive and these chips hit 400 mhz and higher easily.
Keep in mind that these chips identical and it costs intel the same amount of money to make a 300 mhz chip as it does a 400 mhz chip and the only distinction they would make is via the binning process as it would be far to costly to make a slower chip when they can just criple a chip they are already making.
It happens all the time with computer components. Companies want to meet the low end demand so they criple or remove features (which ever is cheaper) to sell to those people.
Didn't you take any marketing when you got that EE degree?