Originally Posted by cmagdanz
|
I used an x50v for the last 3 years. Last fall I tried out the WM5 upgrades on it over several months, but filesys.exe was a show stopper, so I went back to WM2003. Several months ago, I bought a "new" x51v on eBay (after strongly considering the HP 210), and immediately upgraded to WM6.1 (trying several ROM's from several authors), and I love it. A definite difference in performance and features exists among WM6 ROM's; they all have their pros & cons; much of it is personal preference.
I would love to hear from someone about a full side-by-side comparison of an x51v(WM6.1) and an HP 210 (dkimak?).
|
Unfortunately, I've given my x51v to my father, after upgrading to WM6 so I can't give a fair comparison for an HP 210 vs x51v with WM6.1.
I'll readily admit that I'm one of those people that likes leading-edge technology. Comparing the two units with WM6
HP210 has better
- battery life
- screen (brightness, clarity)
- responsiveness / performance
x51v has better
- form factor
- accessories (ok, MORE accessories)
For how I use a PDA (ebooks, GPS, photos, music, calendars and contacts), the HP 210 is a significant upgrade to the x51v. That said, the HP 210 has quality control problems, there are a lot of frustrated 210 users out there.