|
|
| X50 / X51 Forums Talk about anything related to the X50 / X51 series. |
|
09-19-04, 01:49 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
Aximsite Major League
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego CA until Aug 21st.
Posts: 379
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
640x480 Problems?
Just wondering, will there be any software compatibility problems with the "new" VGA 640x480 screen (assuming it comes out)? Is it possible that some programs might not run or is that not an issue?
|
|
|
|
09-19-04, 02:03 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Compatibility problems will be with WM2003SE, NOT the VGA screen.
|
|
|
|
|
09-19-04, 02:08 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Aximsite All Star
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 551
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
its just twice the pixels, why would any app care?
__________________
Bodom Beach Terror!
|
|
|
|
09-19-04, 02:23 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Aximsite Major League
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego CA until Aug 21st.
Posts: 379
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by kronchev
|
|
its just twice the pixels, why would any app care?
|
Thats what I was thinking, but what about apps that play games or videos things like that....just wondering if there might some problems with those trying to adjust to a large screen size.
|
|
|
|
09-19-04, 03:51 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
Aximsite Rookie
DAP Freshman
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: at home
Posts: 60
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
i think its a pretty valid question.
you wouldn't be able to answer it till you tried it out though. most programmers try to code for situations like this but with a PPC you might see different results; hard to tell.
dang - i didn't realize it was 640x480. that is enough to make me toss the X30H and get the X50.
|
|
|
|
09-19-04, 05:27 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Aximsite Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 55
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
im pretty sure it would be backwards compatible
__________________
|
Code:
|
________________________________ _____ ____ __.
\_ _____/\______ \_ _____/ / _ \ | |/ _|
| __) | _/| __)_ / /_\ \| <
| \ | | \| \/ | \ | \
\___ / |____|_ /_______ /\____|__ /____|__ \
\/ \/ \/ \/ \/ |
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.FREE GAMES
|
|
|
|
09-19-04, 08:19 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
Aximsite All Star
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 971
Device: Skype
Carrier: N/A
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
For games and the such, it might look a bit more pixelated, due to using four pixels to represent one in a slightly larger screen, but the difference should be minimal.
__________________
Have fun.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. (15 Jan 07)
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Thanks JMJ!
|
|
|
|
09-19-04, 10:56 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Aximsite All Star
 Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 707
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I wonder how WM2003se handles apps that set specific pixels... does it give every app a fake framebuffer and then scale it up if it needs too? Seems like it could pose a problem with gapi apps and other things that reference the screen directly.
|
|
|
|
09-19-04, 11:27 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Aximsite Minor League
Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Maine
Posts: 217
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
My understanding is that VGA pdas run a pixel doubling QVGA mode for compatibility thats a function of 2003SE. Only the toshiba had a pre-se VGA model and they had a very poorly done proprietary handling of this. What I have read is that there are some performance issues for doing so in SE too, but to a greater or lesser degree depending on the model. Se supposedly handles it quite well and toshiba models upgraded to se saw an immediate improvement.
Hopefully the inclusion of hardware graphics accelerators on the newer models will make that a moot issue.
So.. SE handles it and has historically resulted in slow downs but, in theory, that should not be an issue going forward.
This is just what I have read, I have no direct experience. Your mileage may vary.
Regards,
Artuk
|
|
|
|
09-19-04, 02:28 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
|
Originally Posted by emulamer
|
|
I wonder how WM2003se handles apps that set specific pixels... does it give every app a fake framebuffer and then scale it up if it needs too? Seems like it could pose a problem with gapi apps and other things that reference the screen directly.
|
There are GAPI problems. But once again this is a problem with WM2003SE. Meaning that assuming Dell doesn't try anything crazy, or mess anything up, in terms of software (like Toshiba did with their e80x and WM2003) then the compatibility with QVGA programs will be exactly the same between the X30 and X50H.
|
|
|
|
|
09-19-04, 02:32 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
|
Aximsite Major League
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Diego CA until Aug 21st.
Posts: 379
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Can you switch to a lower res for compatibility issues?
__________________
:hide:
--:: To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. ::--
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. | To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
______________________________________________
|
|
|
|
09-19-04, 02:33 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
|
Aximsite Major League
 Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 367
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
It just seems so weird to be talking about a resolution of 640 x 480 as an "improvement" for anything
I still havn't joined the 1600 x 1200 bandwagon for my PC :hide:
__________________
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
-----------------------------------------------------
My Stuffins:
Axim X30 Mid - 312mhz 64mb ROM / 64mb RAM
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Kingston 512mb SD Card
SanDisk 256mb SD Card (x2)
Belkin Screen Protectors
Extra Stylus pack (hey, you never know.. To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. )
Is the Today Screen important to you?
Then read To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts. :approve:
|
|
|
|
09-19-04, 02:38 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
|
Originally Posted by kronchev
|
|
its just twice the pixels, why would any app care?
|
Sorry ! Both veretical and horizontal resolutions - so four times the pixels.
|
|
|
|
|
09-19-04, 02:41 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
|
Aximsite All Star
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 551
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Originally Posted by davrol
|
Sorry ! Both veretical and horizontal resolutions - so four times the pixels.
|
320x240 = 76800
640x480 = 307200
307200 / 76800 = 4
DOh!
__________________
Bodom Beach Terror!
|
|
|
|
09-19-04, 02:42 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
|
Guest
|
Well it's mainly an improvement cause you're comparing it to 320X240. Which is really annoying when using it to mimic PC-like functions on a smaller device (excell, browsing internet, playing videos, etc).
So I wouldn't really compare the upgrade of QVGA to VGA as being on the same [lower] level as the upgrade of a desktop monitor with (S)XGA to one with UXGA.
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:57 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2 Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2003-09 LeckMedia, LLC
|
| |