Notices

X50 / X51 Forums Talk about anything related to the X50 / X51 series.

View Poll Results: What MP3 bitrate do you use for your X50v?
128 12 46.15%
192 8 30.77%
256 1 3.85%
320 1 3.85%
Otther 4 15.38%
Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 12-19-04, 10:41 PM   #1 (permalink)
Aximsite Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: CT, USA
Posts: 51
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Question MP3 Bitrate for your X50v

Was wondering what bit rate people are using for their mp3's on their x50v and why? Can you really tell the difference between bitrates above 128?
iwantanaxim is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsor Ads
Old 12-19-04, 10:43 PM   #2 (permalink)
Aximsite Legend
 
Howard2k's Avatar
Addicted Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 13,721
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

Awards Showcase
Aximsite Active Silver Member Moderator Medal Silver Poster 
Total Awards: 3

It's really personal preference. Different people will notice subtle differences. I encode all my digital music at either 160Kb/s or 192Kb/s using AAC. For MP3 I'd go with 192Kb/s or higher.

The best thing to do is encode the same song in a couple of different bitrates and see if you can tell the difference. The find one that is an acceptable compromise of space and sound.
__________________
Always read stuff that will make you look good if you die in the middle of it.
Howard2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-04, 10:47 PM   #3 (permalink)
Aximsite Minor League
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 110
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The first encoder I had only did 256. The files were really too big. Now I'm doing 128 or 160. Haven't listened a lot but quality seems OK.

TL
tsl90 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-04, 10:55 PM   #4 (permalink)
Aximsite Hall of Fame
 
Don't Panic!'s Avatar
Addicted Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Boston, MA USA
Posts: 8,173
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts

Awards Showcase
Aximsite Active Bronze Member Aximsite Active Silver Member Moderator Medal Bronze Poster 
Total Awards: 4

iwantanaxim-Thank you for not asking "What's the best < insert program/device here >..." That's a pet peeve of mine in PPC discussion forums. ;) Its great to see someone using the scientific approach

The only difference I see/hear between 128 and 192 is larger file size at 192. I haven't tried using variabile bitrate yet but that might solve the file size issue. VBR files use less memory during the quiet parts. YMMV.
__________________
Don't Panic!
Bobby
42
Soft-reset is our Friend
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
Don't Panic! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-04, 11:54 PM   #5 (permalink)
Aximsite Rookie
 
Razor Blade's Avatar
DAP Freshman
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: I AM CANADIAN!
Posts: 87
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well, I havn't got my PPC yet, but I'll be using either 160 or 192. Anything lower sounds bad to me (on songs) and anytthing higher I view as a waste of space, because I can't hear any difference. Each person to their own though.
Razor Blade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-04, 02:12 AM   #6 (permalink)
Aximsite Minor League
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 271
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
lame 'standard' preset which is VBR averaging 160, I think.

I find that a lot of music is kind of lacking at 128 CBR.
ironchef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-04, 02:32 AM   #7 (permalink)
Aximsite Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 90
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
regular "pop" or rock music doesn't need much more than 128 or 160 (on mp3) to sound "good", so I stick to 128 most of the time.

However, having something lower than 320 for classical music is almost out of the question (unless you use vbr @ 256), although somewhat costly on memory and battery consumption, IMO
ikarus_x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-04, 02:40 AM   #8 (permalink)
Aximsite Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 25
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
does the answer also depend on listening to the music from the built-in speaker or headphone/earphone?
__________________
x50v
Kingmax 60x 1G SD
Bluetrek G2 BT headset
Belkin BT GPS
webcamv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-04, 04:31 AM   #9 (permalink)
Aximsite Minor League
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lake Wales, FL
Posts: 247
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i personally use WMA 48 and 64kbps...i found mp3's at 128kbps and higher to be too big since i use only a 128mb sd card...anything below a 128kbps MP3 file sounds crappy and when comparing a 48kbps file to a mp3 at the same bitrate, WMA sounded ALOT better and the file size was ok. if anyone knows of a better file format than WMA that sounds much better at comparible bitrates and lower filesize, please post.
__________________
Dell Axim x50v
3x 128MB Sandisk SD Cards
1x 1GB Lexar SD Card
1x 32MB Lexar SD Card
Dell Bluetooth GPS
CSfLiPfReAkZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-04, 04:46 AM   #10 (permalink)
Aximsite Prospect
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CSfLiPfReAkZ
if anyone knows of a better file format than WMA that sounds much better at comparible bitrates and lower filesize, please post.
That would be Ogg Vorbis.
stela is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-04, 04:49 AM   #11 (permalink)
Aximsite Minor League
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lake Wales, FL
Posts: 247
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stela
That would be Ogg Vorbis.
hmm last time i did a comparison with ogg vorbis, i used a 160kbps mp3 and converted it to a 64kbps mp3,wma, ogg...i found wma and ogg to be of higher quality but ogg was a tad bit bigger in regards to filesize...so i stuck with wma...
__________________
Dell Axim x50v
3x 128MB Sandisk SD Cards
1x 1GB Lexar SD Card
1x 32MB Lexar SD Card
Dell Bluetooth GPS
CSfLiPfReAkZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-04, 07:37 AM   #12 (permalink)
Aximsite Legend
 
Howard2k's Avatar
Addicted Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 13,721
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

Awards Showcase
Aximsite Active Silver Member Moderator Medal Silver Poster 
Total Awards: 3

You shouldn't convert from one lossy format to another.

AAC and OGG score higher than equivalent MP3/WMA bit rates. WMA also tends to score higher than MP3.

But - LAME VBR is good.
__________________
Always read stuff that will make you look good if you die in the middle of it.
Howard2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-04, 09:49 AM   #13 (permalink)
kazuni
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
ogg vorbis and mp3 differences are not that high in normal bitrate ranges (from 112 to 192) with the exception of 160kbps. Other than that, I always use wma for pocket pcs (depends on the source, if i am able to get the CD to rip myself i'd use ogg 160 or vbr -r3mix mp3)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-04, 10:26 AM   #14 (permalink)
Aximsite Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA USA
Posts: 69
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think there is a huge difference between 128 and 192. Im re-ripping all of my CDs that were ripped at 128 as 192. I dont think there is a big difference between 192 and 256. But 128 is definately quiter and I have to have the volume up louder.
_thom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-04, 11:15 AM   #15 (permalink)
Aximsite Major League
 
ooosadface's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 362
Device: Treo 700wx [Windows]
Carrier: Verizon
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I use WinAmp Pro to rip my CDs to MP3s. It has a prest built in called "--alt-preset standard". It uses VBR and I set the lowest to 128 and the highest to 320 (so I voted for 256). There is also a setting for 'VBR Q' with a number from 0-9. I have that set on 2. I have no clue what it is for nor do I care because my mp3s sound great. I used to use 128 for everything but now that I started listening to it this way I can't go back. It looks like (this is NOT scietifically derived)my files are about 1 mb bigger for every 4 mbs (if that makes sense). So a 4 mb file at 128 is now, on average, a 5 mb file. Some a little larger and some a little smaller than the 1 mb difference depending on the quiet spots in the song.

Also, this (Link to EQ thread is making a world of difference! No more software EQ for me!

Rambling now, I'm done... :hide:

Last edited by ooosadface; 12-20-04 at 11:18 AM. Reason: Spelling/punctuation...
ooosadface is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Sponsor Ads

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:12 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
Copyright © 2003-09 LeckMedia, LLC