mkss55442

rspall...PM sent.

__________________
Nothing is never "no problem".

johnhu_2005

rspall, to answer to your questions:

1. It is personal opinion. Personally, I think WM6 is faster and more stable than WM5.

2. You can take a look at WM6+ ROM reviews here.

3. It's mainly speed. It's "customary" that you get a WM5 bootloader before upgrading to WM5.

4. Answered in #3

__________________
Currently running LennySh L11 ROM on my x51v.
Currently running LennySh A09 ROM on my x50v.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
To support me,
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
!

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

rspall

Originally Posted by johnhu_2005

rspall, to answer to your questions: 1. It is personal opinion. Personally, I think WM6 is faster and more stable than WM5. 2. You can take a look at WM6+ ROM reviews here[/URL]. 3. It's mainly speed. It's "customary" that you get a WM5 bootloader before upgrading to WM5. 4. Answered in #3

OK, I bought a replacement unit which has the WM2003 bootloader on it. I then SUCCESSFULLY upgraded the OS to WM5 / A17:

DiAd_K_AximX51v_WM5_M17EN.nb0

SO if I understand correctly, I should upgrade the bootloader to the WM5 bootloader?

The reason for this is to get better performance in WM5 V 17?

What sort of performance increase should I see (i.e. is it worth the risk?).

I WILL NOT TOUCH MY BOOTLOADER UNTIL I AM 100 PERCENT CERTAIN OF THE BENEFITS AND HOW TO DO IT PROPERLY!